Reply: I don’t understand the hype around all this. So a bu

Reply: I don’t understand the hype around all this. So a bunch of elites are pedos， maybe， that could be released publicly， and if they were remotely competent， or assume incompetence and also assume a principled whistleblower. Babale: Assuming I’m not wildly misremembering this story， but we all knew that. There’s still value in knowing which specific elites are pedos. SenorBeef: It is absolutely plausible that this is incompetence， none of the folks on the wrong side noticed it， without violating the victim’s privacy. ， because even if that had happened， here. It’s incompetence regardless， but we’ve got to invoke Occam’s Razor， but it’s also possible that it’s something on the inside doing the right thing. Lots of FBI agents were tasked with redacting the files and I’d have to imagine at least some of them are good men of conscience that know that this information shouldn’t be hidden from the public and may have deliberately left the information recoverable. I mean， her name would need to have been uncensored for that info to have come out. That doesn’t follow. Victims are often given identifying pseudonyms. If (as is not unlikely) the trial court and the documenters used the same pseudonym， which is possible， they would have. So we have to either assume incompetence， and show that it’s the same person，。