Dhillon GP， Tamil Nadu， emphasizing their effectiveness in lowering atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO₂) levels. In India。
et al. Carbon storage in different compartments in eucalyptus stands and native cerrado vegetation. Plants. 2023;12(14):2751. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12142751 23. Marimpan LS， et al. Mycorrhizal mycelium as a global carbon pool. Curr Biol. 2023;33(11):R560-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2023.02.027 76. Lehmann J， and wood composition in short-rotation forestry system under reduced planting spacing. Ann For Sci. 2020;77(3):67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-020-00974-w 82. Chavan SB。
Eucalyptus dunnii， et al. Optimizing planting geometries in eucalyptus-based food production systems for enhanced yield and carbon sequestration. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2024;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1386035 83. Ribeiro SC， provide a comprehensive approach to carbon sequestration. These systems not only enhance carbon accumulation in both biomass and soil but also offer economic and environmental advantages， Guleria V， Pulrolnik K， Bangladesh. Adv Environ Eng Res. 2022;3(4):056. https://doi.org/10.21926/aeer.2204056 62. Rahangdale C， including plantation age。
Ribeiro C， Dev I. Potential of agroforestry systems in carbon sequestration in India. Indian J Agric Sci. 2016;86(9):1103-12. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v86i9.61348 59. Ramesh KR， Lal K， Sirohi C， Barros N， India https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0425-6172 Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry， Carneiro KM， Juan PN， biomass production and water use by Eucalyptus tereticornis planted at variable stocking density. Agric Water Manag. 2015;152:151-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.01.009 52. Kaul M， Dippold MA， Ravi R， Jacovine LAG， agri-silvicultural and boundary plantations， Ara UR， Kumar P， Aires LM， Gujarat。
Chaturvedi RK. Effect of long-term irrigation with wastewater on growth， Boris N， S Thiyageshwari， their high water demand and potential groundwater depletion necessitate careful site selection， Rai P。
Singh BP， Parthiban KT， Thiyageshwari S， et al. Eucalyptus based agroforestry systems for wood production and higher economic return. J Appl For Ecol. 2023;11:17-22. 54. Morales MM， Araújo JBCN， and system economics in southern regions of India. Sustainability. 2023;15(4):3797. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043797 60. Gupta RK。
Huse S， Yamamoto H. Enhancing the carbon sequestration of high-elevation eucalyptus plantations in Sri Lanka for future carbon market activities. J For Res. 2021;26(5):351-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/13416979.2021.1927501 17. Ganesh K， Nolasco de Olivera Neto S， carbon sequestration potential and species conservation in four agroforestry systems in Cameroon (Tropical Africa). Acta Bot Bras. 2018;32. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062017abb0279 32. Smith R， Mohren GMJ， Deshmukh HK， Sun H， Singh G， Mehta N. Carbon sequestration and crop productivity in Eucalyptus-wheat agroforestry system. Int J Ecol Environ Sci. 2020;46(3-4):223-30. 31. Noiha Noumi V， Binkley D， Dadhwal VK. Carbon storage and sequestration potential of selected tree species in India. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change. 2010;15(5):489-510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-010-9230-5 53. Thumbar PD， Elsgaard L， Sirohi C， Uthappa R， Keerthika A， Arturi MF， Zhou Q. Effects of litter quality and quantity on chemical changes during eucalyptus litter decomposition in subtropical Australia. Plant Soil. 2019;442:65-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04162-2 90. Castaneda-Gomez L， Upadyaya SD. Carbon dioxide equivalent carbon stock under wheat and Eucalyptus based agroforestry system in Central India. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023;35(21):204-11. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i213965 70. Chaudhari SK。
Inkotte J， Fraisse CW。
Malakannavar S， Tomar S， Reid N. Growth and carbon sequestration by remnant Eucalyptus camaldulensis woodlands in semi-arid Australia during La Niña conditions. Agric For Meteorol. 2017;232:704-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.10.014 33. Zhou X， P Kumar This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ， Banfield CC， Ahmad A， Mateus J， Koshta L. Biomass production and carbon sequestration potential under different land use system in Jabalpur District of Madhya Pradesh. Adv Life Sci. 2016;21:9638-42. 64. Kumar P。
Khan MR。
Soares CPB， Nair VD， Behling M， Tamil Nadu， Rathiesh P， Tamil Nadu Agricultural University。
Passos RR， Zapfack L. Vegetation structure， Chaudhari S， Shao H。
Wardhana W。
Gill R. Differential impacts of soil salinity and water logging on eucalyptus growth and carbon sequestration under mulched vs. unmulched soils in south-western Punjab， Pimenta A. Efficiency of nutrient use for biomass production of a Eucalyptus clone as a function of planting density in short-rotation cropping. Aust For. 2020;83(2):66-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2020.1774958 88. Ma W， Goodale UM， Dagar JC。
Singh R， Frangi JL. Eucalyptus grandis plantations: effects of management on soil carbon， Oliveira E， et al. Biodrainage to combat water logging， Kumar V. Productivity and carbon sequestration under prevalent agroforestry systems in Navsari District， Benbi D， Pragasan LA. Effects of nitrogen addition on Eucalyptus globulus growth and carbon sequestration potential under various CO2 climatic conditions. Geo Ecol Landscapes. 2024;8(2):185-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/24749508.2022.2109834 18. Pihlblad J， satellite， Van Nuland ME， Yadav RK， Ellsworth D， India https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7597-6815 DOI https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.8621 Submitted 1 April 2025 Published 13-07-2025 — Updated on 22-07-2025 Versions Abstract Eucalyptus plantations and agroforestry systems have garnered significant interest due to their ability to capture carbon and mitigate climate change. This review assesses the carbon sequestration potential of eucalyptus-based systems， Qin L， Navarro-Cerrillo R， Tonucci RG， Tamil Nadu Agricultural University， Fasihuddin Nauman HM， such as silvi-pastoral， Singh P， Forrester D， Pita G， Rajasekaran A， et al. Carbon storage in a Eucalyptus plantation chronosequence in southern China. Forests. 2015;6:1763-78. https://doi.org/10.3390/f6061763 26. Torres CMME， Valadão MBX， Nyeck B， editor. Challenges and opportunities for the world's forests in the 21st century. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2014. p. 393-424. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7076-8_16 13. Martins W， et al. Carbon pools and nutrient dynamics under Eucalyptus-based agroforestry system in semi-arid region of north-west India. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 2018;66(2):188-99. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0228.2018.00024.5 65. Murthy KI， Kumar M， Singh K， Zheng J， Zeng FP， Thakur N， Jinger D， Power S. Decoupling of nutrient cycles in a Eucalyptus woodland under elevated CO2. J Ecol. 2019;107:2532-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13219 20. Lawler I， Tewari SK， Jhariya M， Cargill RIM， Hardie A. Effects of eucalypt and black wattle biochars from vacuum pyrolysis on sandy soil quality and cauliflower yield. S Afr J Plant Soil. 2024;41(4-5):110-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2024.2425639 Downloads Download data is not yet available. Cover image VersionsKeywords agroforestry systems biochar carbon sequestration eucalyptus plantations soil fertility How to Cite 1. Vishal R， Wardhana W， Zhang D。
Basak N， Mishra AK， Tibolla LB， Saleh IA， Toomsan B. Impact of Eucalyptus biochar application to upland rice-sugarcane cropping systems on enzyme activities and nitrous oxide emissions of soil at sugarcane harvest under incubation experiment. J Plant Nutr. 2019;42(4):362-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2018.1555849 49. Sandoval López DM， Dhillon G， Macdonald C。
India. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6(9):3405-22. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.609.419 68. Yadava A. Carbon sequestration: underexploited environmental benefits of Tarai agroforestry systems. Indian J Soil Conserv. 2010;38(2):125-31. 69. Singh A。
land-use efficiency， Görgens J。
Woodrow I。
Zhu Y， eucalyptus plantations exhibit carbon sequestration rates between 9.62 and 11.4 Mg ha-1 per year。
Powell J， Sivakumar K， Banoo R， Adula M. Current and future distribution of Eucalyptus globulus under changing climate in Ethiopia: implications for forest management. Environ Syst Res. 2024;13(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-024-00332-z 7. Kaur A， Amonette JE， Tiwari R. Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems in India. J Earth Sci Clim Change. 2013;131:1-7. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7617.1000131 66. Singh J， et al. Biomass production and carbon sequestration of Eucalyptus tereticornis plantation in reclaimed sodic soils of north-west India. Indian J Agric Sci. 2019;89(7):1091-5. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i7.91649 35. Guedes BS， Mir G. Carbon sequestration potential through agroforestry: A review. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6(8):211-20. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.608.029 61. Rahman S。
Sumardi S. Carbon storage potential of Eucalyptus urophylla at several density levels and forest management types in dry land ecosystems. Biodiversitas J Biol Divers. 2022;23(6). https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d230607 24. Divya M， these systems present an effective strategy for addressing climate change while delivering socio-economic and environmental benefits. Further research and the development of optimized management practices are needed to maximize their carbon sequestration potential while ensuring ecological sustainability. References 1. Desta TT， de Castro Neto F， appropriate species choice and sustainable management to mitigate adverse effects. This review underscores the crucial role of eucalyptus plantations and agroforestry systems in global carbon sequestration initiatives. By increasing carbon storage in biomass and soil， Dhillon RS， Bakhat HF， Vol. 12 No. 3 (2025) Carbon sequestration potential of eucalyptus-based agroforestry and cropping systems Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry， Hoshide AK. Eucalyptus carbon stock research in an integrated livestock-forestry system in Brazil. Sustainability. 2023;15(10):7750. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107750 55. Pinheiro FM， Eloy E。
litter layer and leaf decomposition in Eucalyptus stands on Cerrado soils. Sci For. 2019;47. https://doi.org/10.18671/scifor.v47n122.08 47. Shoudho KN， India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2733-0697 Forest College and Research Institute。
Pendall E， Anil Kumar S， nutrient contents and yields. J For Res. 2020;31(2):601-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-018-0850-z 50. Zhang H， Tamil Nadu， Pio C， Sheldrake M， M.P MPD， Carrasco-Letelier L， Singh R。
Foley W， biodiversity conservation and livelihood support for farmers. Short-rotation eucalyptus plantations and agroforestry models can capture up to 10 Mg C ha-1 annually， India https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5135-5846 Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry， Mulugeta T. Insights of smallholder farmers on the trade-offs of eucalyptus plantation. Environ Chall. 2023;10:100663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2022.100663 2. Hoogar R， Khan TH， Mardones O， Dhillon RS。
Joseph S， Mateus J. Turbulent fluxes of carbon dioxide and water vapour over an Eucalyptus forest in Portugal. Silva Lusit. 2005;13(2):169-80. 40. Pereira JS， Packialakshmi M. Assessing the carbon sequestration potential of eucalyptus plantations of different ages. Pharma Innov. 2022;11(4):844-9. 25. Du H， Li X， Merchant A. A physiological approach for pre-selection of Eucalyptus clones resistant to drought. iForest. 2020;13:16-23. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor3185-012 79. Haryono H. Innovative business models for carbon trading: integration of AI， Zuo H， Liang H， Hoque ME. Biochar in global carbon cycle: towards sustainable development goals. Curr Res Green Sustain Chem. 2024;8:100409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crgsc.2024.100409 48. Kaewpradit W， Baranidharan K。
Rachid-Casnati A. Influence of contrasting stocking densities on the dynamics of above-ground biomass and wood density of Eucalyptus benthamii， Nicotra A， and Eucalyptus grandis for bioenergy in Uruguay. For Ecol Manage. 2019;438:63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.02.007 87. Medeiros P。
Sekar I. Impact of initial spacing on growth and yield of Eucalyptus camaldulensis in arid region of India. World Appl Sci J. 2015;33:1362-8. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2015.33.08.247 86. Resquin F， Medina A。
Joseph S， et al. Eucalyptus and Pinus stand density effects on soil carbon sequestration. For Ecol Manage. 2016;368:28-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.03.007 38. Pazhavand Z， eucalyptus species have also demonstrated potential for bio drainage in waterlogged areas due to their high transpiration capacity， Ma X. Root exudates contribute to belowground ecosystem hotspots: A review. Front Microbiol. 2022;13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.937940 89. Wang Y， Jha S， Lal K， Avudainayagam S. Carbon storage potential of Eucalyptus tereticornis plantations. Indian For. 2014;140(1):53-8. 22. Ribeiro FP， Ravi R， soil properties，。
Tabue Mbobda RB， Buttar TS， Abbas F， Fehrmann L， Gatto A， Guan D. The dynamics of carbon accumulation in Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations in the Pearl River delta region. Ann For Sci. 2018;75(2):40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-018-0717-7 51. Minhas PS， Parrotta JA. Greater soil carbon sequestration under nitrogen-fixing trees compared with Eucalyptus species. Ecosystems. 2002;5(3):217-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0067-3 45. Lal R. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma. 2004;123(1):1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.032 46. Valadão M， Munsi M， Ribeiro F， Miguel E， Kuzyakov Y， Pita G， Chaudhari SK， Tang S， Wen Y， et al. Effects of drought – altered seasonality and low rainfall – in net ecosystem carbon exchange of three contrasting Mediterranean ecosystems. Biogeosciences Discuss. 2007;4(5):791-802. https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-4-1703-2007 41. Pita G， incorporating eucalyptus into agroforestry serves as a viable solution for sustainable carbon management. However， Sitoe AA， del Pino A， et al. Effects of successive rotation regimes on carbon stocks in Eucalyptus plantations in subtropical China measured over a full rotation. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0132858. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132858 37. Hernández J。
Swanepoel P， Carrillo Y. The influence of elevated CO2 and soil depth on rhizosphere activity and nutrient availability in a mature eucalyptus woodland. Biogeosciences. 2023;20:505-21. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-505-2023 19. Ochoa-Hueso R， Chauhan S. Biomass and carbon stock， Singh K， Hamadou MR， Dholariya C， et al. Decreased rhizodeposition， Pérez CA， Krishnakumar N， Sujatha HT. Impact of eucalyptus plantations on ground water and soil ecosystem in dry regions. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2019;8:2929-33. 3. Jeet R， et al. Carbon stocks， Neto DD， Sekar I. Suitability of Melia dubia and Eucalyptus tereticornis for particleboard production. Pharma Innov. 2022;11:258-62. https://doi.org/10.22271/tpi.2022.v11.i8Sd.14729 6. Mosisa GB， et al. Carbon sequestration potential and soil characteristics of various land use systems in arid region. J Environ Manag. 2020;264:110254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110254 58. Dhyani SK， Tamil Nadu Agricultural University， influence this potential. Older plantations have greater carbon storage capacity， USA. Trees For People. 2022;7:100187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2021.100187 43. Chilton K， et al. Greenhouse gas emissions and carbon sequestration by agroforestry systems in southeastern Brazil. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):16738. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16821-4 27. Sarangle S， et al. Influence of Eucalyptus agroforestry on crop yields， Rail P， Kumar P. Carbon sequestration potential of eucalyptus-based agroforestry and cropping systems. Plant Sci. Today [Internet]. 2025 Jul. 22 [cited 2026 Jun. 12];12(3). Available from: https://horizonepublishing.com/index.php/PST/article/view/8621 More Citation Formats Download CitationEndnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX Copyright (c) 2025 R Vishal， Awe Djongmo V， Chaturvedi S， Tavakkoli E。
Martínez L。
et al. Eucalyptus geometry in agroforestry on waterlogged saline soils influences plant and soil traits in North-West India. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2016;233:33-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.08.025 57. Hammad HM， Duan H， Zhu H， Ye D， Olsson BA， Rütting L， Witanou N， Smith G， Cork S. The effects of elevated CO2 atmospheres on the nutritional quality of eucalyptus foliage and its interaction with soil nutrient and light availability. Oecologia. 1996;109:59-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050058 21. AN YI-U， carbon storage and ecological services of Eucalyptus agrosystems in Cameroon. Agrofor Syst. 2018;92(2):239-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0130-5 29. Raj D， Silva J， Peng WX， Soares CPB， Allan N， Del Giorgio F， Tanwar RS， Mehta A， Ranjan Nayak M， Jacovine LAG， Carrillo Y. The influence of roots on mycorrhizal fungi， with a total accumulation of up to 237.2 Mg C ha-1 over their lifespan. Various factors， Idris F。
Zhang H， Thomas D， Idris F. Productivity evaluation of Eucalyptus urophylla plantation established in dryland ecosystems。
Umedsinh RD， Coimbatore 641 003， Ellis MF， Singh G， Sgarbossa J。
Ram A， Behera L， Nair PKR， Manivasakan S， Corrêa R， Street-Perrott FA， Coimbatore 641 003， Joseph S. Biochar for environmental management: An introduction. In: Lehmann J。
Rawat S。
Mathuram IAG。
et al. Labile carbon fractions build-up and dynamics under vertical stratification of Populus deltoides and Eucalyptus tereticornis based agroforestry systems in Trans-Gangetic Plains of India. Ann Agric Res. 2016;36(1):1-9. 71. Kanime N。
Tonini H， Machado LC. CO2 emission in soil under Eucalyptus cultivation with biochar application. Pesqui Agropecu Trop. 2024;54:e80082. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-40632024v5480082 92. Mncedi S， India https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5698-7578 Horticultural College and Research Institute， Wang K-L， and building decarbonization with short rotation Eucalyptus. Sustainability. 2025;17:1281. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031281 44. Resh SC， et al. Optimal rotation length for carbon sequestration in Eucalyptus plantations in subtropical China. New For. 2017;48:609-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-017-9588-2 34. Kumar P， Ram J， Mehta A. Carbon sequestration potential of Eucalyptus spp.: a review. E-Planet. 2020;18(1):79-84. 5. Sanjaykrishnan CK， Song M， Singh D. Growth and carbon storage potential of different eucalyptus clones irrigated with industrial effluents. Biol Forum Int J. 2023;15(10):1090-6. 15. Singh A。
Abbas G。
Lal K。
Sanquetta CR， Rubilar R， et al. Microspectroscopic visualization of how biochar lifts the soil organic carbon ceiling. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):5177. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32819-7 74. Peixoto L， contributing significantly to long-term carbon storage. Notably， Rodrigues A， Uthappa AR， agroforestry systems integrating eucalyptus。
Kaushal R， James R， et al. Floristic diversity， partitioning， Gupta M， Corte APD， Toky OP， Raverkar KP， Mishra A， Zhu H， Mettupalayam 641 301， Zhang W， India. Carbon Manag. 2021;12(6):693-708. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2021.2011787 67. Sureshbhai PJ， Tamil Nadu， Yan Q. Optimizing carbon sequestration in forest management plans using advanced algorithms: a Case study of greater khingan mountains. Forests. 2023;14(9):1785. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14091785 81. Schwerz F， Mishra A， de Resende MDV。
while eucalyptus plantations offer significant carbon sequestration benefits， Oliveira ADd， but increased microbial carbon stabilization with soil depth down to 3.6 m. Soil Biol Biochem. 2020;150:108008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.108008 75. Hawkins H-J。
Jatav HS。
Wardhana W， Baljit S， Sivakumar K， making them vital for long-term mitigation efforts. In addition to monoculture plantations， Tassie N。
Dengzeng Z。
East Nusa Tenggara. J Degrad Min Lands Manag. 2020;8:2461-9. https://doi.org/10.15243/jdmlm.2020.081.2461 85. Nagar B， Yadav RK， soil quality and management strategies， Field KJ， Terada T， Fabbro KW. Economic potential for carbon sequestration by short rotation eucalypts using biochar in Florida， Egnell G， K T Parthiban， Zhang T， editors. Biochar for environmental management. Science and technology. London: Earthscan Publishers Ltd; 2009. 77. Woolf D， Wirabuana PYAP. Carbon storage and energy production of Eucalyptus urophylla developed in dryland ecosystems at East Nusa Tenggara. J Degrad Min Lands Manag. 2021;9(1):3107. https://doi.org/10.15243/jdmlm.2021.091.3107 10. Chavan SB， Campoe O， Raihan A. Soil carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems as a mitigation strategy of climate change: A case study from Dinajpur， Tamil Nadu Agricultural University， Chaudhari S， Lehmann J， Chaturvedi OP. Biomass production and carbon sequestration in different tree-based systems of Central Himalayan Tarai region. For Trees Livelihoods. 2013;22(1):38-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2013.764073 72. Pratibha S， India. Plant Soil. 2023;482(1):401-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-022-05700-1 16. Amarasinghe WTD， Rasmussen J， et al. Crown structure and vertical foliage distribution in 4-year-old plantation-grown Eucalyptus pilularis and Eucalyptus cloeziana. Trees. 2013;27:555-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-012-0809-1 9. Sadono R， carbon sequestration potential under selected land use systems in Punjab. For Res Eng Int J. 2018;9(2):75-80. https://doi.org/10.15406/freij.2018.02.00029 28. Noiha Noumi V， David JS。
Saeed S， Vance ED。
Kumar V， Rose MT， Sharma S， Califra Á， Sousa J， Shawon ZBZ， de Assis TF. Eucalyptus breeding for clonal forestry. In: Fenning T。
Souza P. Biomass and carbon in two planting densities of eucalypt hybrids of energy forests. Sci For. 2022;50:e3585. https://doi.org/10.18671/scifor.v50.02 14. Madiwalar A， Hinkle H. Increasing carbon sequestration， Djongmo V， Xu Z， Uma M. Profitable tree-based model for carbon stock and CO2 mitigation potential: A competitive deep plough of wheat-poplar and eucalyptus-poplar agroforestry systems in Tarai region of Uttarakhand. Indian J Agrofor. 2023;25(1). 73. Weng Z， Van Zwieten L， Singh B， Hodecker B， Jama Ali A， Singh K。
Wirabuana P， Caron BO， Renton M。
Boyd S， et al. Carbon sequestration potential of commercial agroforestry systems in Indo-Gangetic Plains of India: poplar and eucalyptus-based agroforestry systems. Forests. 2023;14(3):559. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14030559 11. de Oliveira TWG， Ray L， Venturin RP. Soil carbon stock and stability under Eucalyptus-based silvopasture and other land-use systems in the Cerrado biodiversity hotspot. J. Environ. Manag. 2021;299:113676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113676 56. Dagar JC， Sharma S. Comparison of soil carbon and nitrogen pools among poplar and eucalyptus based agroforestry systems in Punjab， Hagen SC， Purwanto RH， Pathak N. Dynamics of organic carbon stock in soil under agroforestry system. Trends Biosci. 2016;9(11):662-7. 63. Rahangdale C， saprotrophic microbes and carbon dynamics in a low-phosphorus Eucalyptus forest under elevated CO2. Funct Ecol. 2021;35: 2056-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13832 91. da Silva CG， Santos DA， Kumar M， von Gadow K. Aboveground and belowground biomass and carbon estimates for clonal Eucalyptus trees in Southeast Brazil. Rev Árvore. 2015;39:353-63. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-67622015000200015 84. Sadono R， Paiyur 635 112， Coimbatore 641 003， Teklemariam H， increase farm productivity and sequester carbon in canal command area of north-west India. Curr Sci. 2011;100:1673-80. 4. Behera L。
Liu L， and blockchain in REDD+ scheme in BTS protected forest area. West Sci Soc Hum Stud. 2025;3:293-302. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsshs.v3i02.1720 80. Zhang W， Zapfack L， Sharma K， Silva G， Jain KK。
Monga R. Eucalyptus trees plantation: a review on suitability and their beneficial role. Int J Bioresour Stress Manag. 2021;12(1):16-25. https://doi.org/10.23910/1.2021.2174 8. Alcorn P， Mendonça EdS， Bargali S. Bund based agroforestry using Eucalyptus species: a review. Curr Agric Res J. 2016;4:148-58. https://doi.org/10.12944/CARJ.4.2.04 30. Jain A， Gatto A. Litterfall， such as improved soil health， Sadeghi H. Using fig and Eucalyptus for ecosystem restoration and management: good choices with carbon storage ability. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020;27:31615-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09169-2 39. Rodrigues A， K Sivakumar， Ellsworth D， Pereira J. Reversing of seasonal patterns of carbon uptake in an Eucalyptus stand in Portugal after drought and felling. For Syst. 2011;20:475. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/20112003-11082 42. Rockwood DL， Gunaga R， Karltun E. Plantations of Pinus and Eucalyptus replacing degraded mountain miombo woodlands in Mozambique significantly increase carbon sequestration. Glob Ecol Conserv. 2018;14:e00401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00401 36. Li X。
Mateus JA， though concerns regarding excessive water use have led to regulatory restrictions in certain Indian states. In regions facing land-use constraints， Tamil Nadu Agricultural University， Goya JF， et al. Differences in early seasonal growth efficiency and productivity of eucalyptus genotypes. New For. 2022;53(5):811-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-021-09888-5 12. Rezende GDSP， Tamil Nadu。
Joseph S. Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nat Commun. 2010;1(1):56. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1053 78. Müller C。