but I read her dissertation and was surprised by what I considered a lack of ‘hard science’ and research or statistical analysis of the ‘data’ that was presented. Most of it seemed to consist of her personal experiences and how she felt about them. , they are doctors, since this is GQ and let’s keep this to the facts. What is even worse is the proliferation of unaccredited online ‘universities’ that offer ‘doctorates’ in whatever field one would want to pay for. ‘Doctor of Parapsychology’ for a few hundred dollars. I recall a Ph.D. vs. M.D. thread some time ago. See: ?s=threadid=139691highlight=Ph.D. From that。
I gather a lot of physicians do not like non-M.D.s being called ‘Doctor’. But a lot of the faculty at med schools are Ph.D. holders and not M.D.s. But the debate goes on about how the Ph.D. is the highest degree and an M.D. is somehow a ‘lower academically’ professional degree. Professor vs. Doctor at universities can be an easy debate to answer (in most cases): Many Ph.D.s working at universities are postdoctoral fellows and are not professors on the faculty. In that case, I had a roommate who received an Ed.d. or Ph.D. in education (I’m not sure which, is your degree in ‘religous’ studies? I don’t want to seem personal (if it is in ‘religous’ studies), DrDeth, but 'doctor of divinity’ would seem to rank below Ed.d in terms of academic rigor. But your empathic “NO” piqued me. I wonder why you think that. I apologize in advance if I have you wrong, but not professors. And most professors (at least in my experience) don’t really care about being called ‘Doctor’. Which brings me to: KenP—your comment about mickey mouse degrees almost made laugh out loud—that has been my experience: ~“they protest too much.” As a personal aside, So, now),。
